This question refers to the text "An Apprenticeship Agreement from 1250" from the lesson <em>The Rise of Europe</em>.
In this text, we are able to see an agreement that was drafted between Ouede Ferconne and Matthew Haimart. In this agreement, Ferconne states that she agrees that her son Michael will become the apprentice of Haimart for four years in order to become a weaver. However, after two years, Ferconne will be able to legally purchase her son back.
There are several reasons why Ferconne might want to buy Michael back. Michael might not like the profession, and he might wish to change it. Moreover, Michael might be unhappy with Haimart. Michael might also believe that he has learned enough after two years, and that four are unnecessary. All of these reasons could lead Ferconne to purchase Michael back.
Most were responsible reformers but some like Carrie a nation were irresponsible agitators.
Answer:
Your opinion
Explanation:
Below is my answer, but I have done a lot of research already:
- The ultimate aim of the Nazi Party was to seize power through Germany's parliamentary system
- By 1941 Nazi forces had occupied much of Europe.
- Adolf Hitler, the leader of Germany’s Nazi Party
- Hitler became interested in politics during his years in Vienna
- The Holocaust was the sponsored<em>(and I mean state-sponsored)</em> mass murder of some 6 million European Jews.
- Ethnic cleansing and genocide
- Started on September 1, 1939
- Brutally treated children, and even elderly
I hope to convey the message the the series of events that occurred is something that was done after research after reading Anne Frank's diary and visiting various Holocaust memorial websites. I do not with that any of the facts above be taken in the wrong way and I mean no offense.
Hope this helps,
--Applepi101
Answer: It was the Greeks
The correct answer is <span>A. By approval of conventions in three-fourths of the states
The most common way is the third one, three-fourths of state legislatures and a supermajority of the congress approves it, however, only once the first method was used. It is a legitimate option outlined in the constitution. The congress can call for national conventions which can pass the amendment but this doesn't happen often.</span>
