In my opinion, Americanization can be both good and bad for
young adolescents. It can help them become independent but it can also cause
major issue with culture. The US had been the home of many cultures. There is a
possibility that many of these adolescents might forget their cultural
traditions and practices because they are more used to being American.
As for the largest number of ports, i'm pretty sure that the British and the French held the most of it.
I'm not sure about which one is the least though, but it won't be the country that had a strong military empire.
The right answer is C: Participating in an interest group. An interest, lobby or advocacy group consists of an organized group of people that, seeking a common public interest, get together and work jointly in order to advocate for and pursue that interest before the authorities.
It has been theorized that increased awareness of death, called mortality salience, leads people to have lighter penalties to those who break moral cultural traditions, respond more positively to people who criticize their country, show disrespect for cultural icons, such as flags. give larger rewards to people who uphold cultural standards.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.