Answer:
Please see below
Explanation:
The original primates' key adaptations to their arboreal life way included binocular vision to judge depth and be able to jump to the next brach without falling to a certain death; an opposable thumb, to be able to hold to a branch with a secure grip, and arms longer than legs to swing from branch to branch. This forced them to walk on all fours but it wasn't disadvantageous because they went down to the floor for short periods. During their transformation to humans which resulted from their invading a new habitat in the more open grassy savannas, the opposable thumbs allowed them to use tools, like rocks and sticks which they could use to get food and defend against their enemies. They had to walk upright on two legs, to be able to see afar and locate potential food or predators, so natural selection eventually resulted in longer legs and a modification in the backbone. The significance of this evolutionary history is that modern humans are what they are as a result of a combination of preadaptations from their arboreal ancestors and the new features that resulted from their new habitat on the open ground of the savanna.
"They are similar because both capture the bond energy of glucose in the bond energy of ATP" is the statement that <span>is true regarding similarities and differences between aerobic and anaerobic respiration. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B".</span>
Answer:
The five major similarities between the given instances are described below.
Explanation:
- Art seems to be about men's job of making things or even just meanings. Philosophy should be about what life, reality, and wisdom represent.
- Philosophy couldn't be incorrect, just as art can't be that bad. That is an incoherent term.
- The argument that theory goes around through communities or never comes to a satisfactory conclusion has always been the main topic including its argument. That's only because philosophy becomes interpreted as if it were science rather than art.
- Art and Philosophy will say, I'm making this. Those would be the ideal illustration of the intelligence of man.
- Art seems to be an undertaking that aims at creating something aesthetically intriguing and that would be valued for its attractiveness or expressive strength. Philosophy approaches art from such a situational-perspective, i.e., attempting to ascertain whatever was rather than concentrating on a single piece of art or observing general trends.
Habitat loss..The most harmful threat to biodiversity is the D. Habitat loss.
It's not easy to live in a place that you no longer have any means of living. If ones organism loss his habitat, chances are they will extinct because of the absence of their basic needs.
Did you find the answer I need help on this to