Most basic examples of recursion, and most of the examples presented here, demonstrate direct recursion, in which a function calls itself. Indirect recursion occurs when a function is called not by itself but by another function that it called (either directly or indirectly). For example, if f calls f, that is direct recursion, but if f calls g which calls f, then that is indirect recursion of f. Chains of three or more functions are possible; for example, function 1 calls function 2, function 2 calls function 3, and function 3 calls function 1 again.
Indirect recursion is also called mutual recursion, which is a more symmetric term, though this is simply a difference of emphasis, not a different notion. That is, if f calls g and then g calls f, which in turn calls g again, from the point of view of f alone, f is indirectly recursing, while from the point of view of g alone, it is indirectly recursing, while from the point of view of both, f and g are mutually recursing on each other. Similarly a set of three or more functions that call each other can be called a set of mutually recursive functions.
Answer:
69.08265412 milliseconds
Explanation:
Lets first convert 7 MiB to bits
bits
Now convert bits to Gbits
Gbits
Queuing Delay = Total size/transmission link rate
Queuing Delay= 
seconds
Delay of packet number 3 = 
seconds
or 
milliseconds
Answer:
Attenuation is the one-word answer which is the correct answer for the above question.
Explanation:
Attenuation is a concept which told about the barrier, which is used to stop the signals in the connected network systems. Attenuation can be a form of any type of barrier like weak signals, or because of long-distance.
Following are the example which is in the form of attenuation--
- Noise
- The distance can also be a problem for weak signals.
- Hacker also disestablished the network signals.
- The physical objects.
Hence the attenuation can be formed by any of the barriers of signals, like physical obstruction, longer distance, and radio inference.
Answer:
<u>a. The scientists must be careful of how many variables they include in their simulation so they do not cause further harm to the frogs.</u>
Explanation:
It is not statistically accurate to assume that the number of variables included in the simulation would cause further harm to the frogs because we need to <em>remember </em>that a simulation is simply a computerized imitation of a real situation, which is usually not totally alike with a real process.
So in no way from a statistical standpoint, does the scientists' decision on the number of variables causes direct harm to the frogs.
Answer:
Locutor
Explanation:
Asi se llama el papel de la voz en la radio
Espero y te sirva :)
