The option that explains the reason that a filmed version that uses color would be more effective than a black-and-white version of either text is: B Mendel's experiments focused on the color of the flowers of the plant, which is part of the description of the setting
It will be more logical to use the colored version of a text when discussing a topic that focuses on the colors of flowers.
This will help the reader to have a better grasp of the differences being communicated by the author. Therefore option B is right.
Learn more about colored version of text here:
brainly.com/question/2961505
Well I really like agruementative and imaginative some call it free style but out of those two it'll have to be imaginative because it just lets your mind wonder as you come up with all the charictors and the situations that they get into and how they wiggle themselves out. I'm not so good at writeing easys about books or aticles, I dont know why exactly but it's just always been a struggle for me ever since my first book report. I would read the book or aticle take notes and all but when it came down to actully writing about it all I could come up with was a breif summury.I actully used to want to be a writer and would write short storys or an amiture kids book but that chagned really quickly and I never went back to it.
This is just a small paragraph I came up with
Coordinating Conjunctions
Answer:
use distopian for an example the author shows what is in their mind by giving a somewhat scary futuristic image
Explanation:
In the poem "Guilt," Jed Chambers works to draw sympathy from the reader and give them the message that hurting other animals is wrong. Although the poet used negative language in the beginning of the poem, the first line where he intimates that the narrator was having doubts about the death of the mackerel is line 31: "'Just a fish,' you claimed." <span>Unlike his friend, the speaker believes that the fish is more than "just a fish." </span>He puts a value to the creature, viewing it as a life that should not be wasted. The final two lines (34-35), "I tasted / guilt" further prove this theme. The narrator is regretting killing the fish. Unlike most people, he views the mackerel as more than just dinner; he has problem with the fact that the animal's life was taken so thoughtlessly. In "Guilt," Chambers does an excellent job of provoking thought regarding the value of animal life through effective language and a compelling first-person perspective.
Hope this helps!
