What Martin's questions reveal about her point of view toward Bates' work is that:
- Some inmates were able to relate to some of Shakespeare's works than many scholars because such inmates had such similar experiences.
This question is related to "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"
<h3>About "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"</h3>
"Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison" is an article that was written by Mitchel Martin who interviewed Laura Bates.
Laura Bates is known to be author of “Shakespeare Saved My Life: Ten Years of Solitary with the Bard." In the story, she shared how she successfully taught Shakespeare works to inmates in a maximum security prison.
With her interaction with Martin, we discover that Bates' work reveal that the prisoners could relate to some of the events that transpired in some of Shakespeare's plays because they've had similar experiences before.
Learn more about Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison on brainly.com/question/11944939
Elizabeth tells the court that John never had an affair with Abigail. She does this to try to help him but it actually just wrecks his entire testimony.
Thats cool i guess, whatever
Answer:
B. The patient will immediately spike a fever, followed by fits of chills and sweats.
Explanation:
The sentences follow a structure that start with a time period and follow with a happening. This is the case here in option B. The time period is when "<em>the patient will immediately spike a fever"</em>. What happens is that it will be <em>"followed by fits of chills and sweats"</em>. Also, this is the only option that is divided in two by a comma, which happens in all sentences os the excerpt.
I would say this would classify as a downward comparison as the person is talking about Mark who has a poorer job situation than him and this could be used to bolster the speaker's ego or to knock poor Mark or could just be an observation.
