Given that Jenny earned $44,500 in 2016.
Her contribution to the Social Security is given by: 6.2% of $44,500 = 0.062 x 44500 = $2,759
Her employer's contribution to the Social Security is given by: 6.2% of $44,500 = 0.062 x 44500 = $2,759
Her contribution to the medicare is given by: 1.45% of $44,500 = 0.0145 x 44500 = $645.25
Her employer's contribution to the Social Security is given by: 1.45% of $44,500 = 0.0145 x 44500 = $645.25
Therefore, her total FICA tax is 2(2,759) + 2(645.25) = $5,518 + $1,290.50 = $6,808.50
Answer:
b. increases to $206
Explanation:
Based on the above information given the holder of the call option will earn a profit if the price of the share increase to 206 because
the price of the stock have to increase to above $205 breakeven which is ($200+$5) in order for the option holder to earn a profit or make a gain.
Hence:
$200 + $5
= $205 (breakeven)
Therefore the holder of the call option will earn a profit if the price of the share increases to $206
When an employee shadows another employee to observe the performance of the duties of his job and then the roles are reversed this is known as: on-the-job training.
- An essential area of human resource management is on-the-job training. It supports both the successful growth of the organization and the individual's professional development. One type of training offered at the workplace is on-the-job training.
- On-the-Job Training (OJT) is defined as training in the public or private sector that is provided to a paid employee while they are engaged in productive work and that offers the knowledge and skills necessary to function fully and adequately on the job. OJT.
- Although it isn't usually the norm, on-the-job training can boost productivity and efficiency in several industries. Additionally, it can be advantageous for the business as a whole, from lowering training expenses to developing more productive, motivated workers.
Thus this is the answer.
To learn more about on-the-job training, refer:brainly.com/question/24613213
#SPJ4
Answer:
Leslie is correct
Explanation:
It is the duty of the real estate agents to inspect properties properly before signing listing agreement or contracts. In this scenario, Katherine did not do her inspection job properly and if in this scenario, Leslie buys the house and finds out about the leaky roof, she is very correct to accuse Katherine of negligent misrepresentation, and thus should hold Katherine liable for the leaky roof problem.
If an employee manager issued an explicit or strongly implied threat that submission to sexual demands is a condition of the employee's job, it would be an example of quid pro quo" harassment.
Protect individuals from discrimination based on characteristics such as race, nationality, religion, and gender. These rights are guaranteed to all citizens under the due process and equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution and the laws of Congress.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination in employment based on race, color, national origin, religion, or sex, and the Equal Employee's Opportunity Commission was appointed to investigate discrimination and enforce the bill's provisions. established a meeting.
Learn more about employees at
brainly.com/question/1190099
#SPJ4
