Answer: It meant a paradoxal situation because the proper foundation of the USA was an anti-imperialist and anti-colonial act. Foundation of the USA was an emancipation against British imperialism. But already in 1840s USA started practicing imperialist policy toward Mexico (Texas) and Central America. It was a paradox. Spanish American war was sort of a culmination of this kind of policy.
Explanation: One of the explanations is a Social Darwinism which was very fashionable at that time and its perspective was applied not only to societies and races but also to history. According to this perspective Latin nations were decadent and condemned to extinction. Such a view seemed to be confirmed by Franco-Prussian war (example). The same perspective followed Americans (Theodor Roosevelt).
They can be held responsible for selling products that may be considered dangerous.
If the item is defective.
If the item has been recalled but the store has not removed the product from their inventory.
The item has to be safe for standard use for consumers that purchase them and that the items won't be harmful to the consumers.
After Italy had agreed to switch sides and help defeat the Entente, they thought they deserved more, being one of the Big Four. Great Britain promised to give them a few of the Slavic countries, but they had other plans to make a large Slavic country known later as Yugoslavia. So, Italy was unhappy because they got cheated by Great Britain.
The Greeks and Romans used weapons as props, while people in the Renaissance did not.