Answer:Friedrich Engels was a philosopher and a communist. He saw history as a series of struggles between two social classes. He saw the development of factories and the rise of mass production as the paradigm of social abuse. He also believed that the masses that worked in these factories were alienated from the product of their labor, and that they lacked political and social power.
A factory owner would have likely seen things differently. He would have probably been happy about the rapid rate of industrialization during this time period. He would have also defended his position as owner of the means of production. Finally, it is likely that he would have seen his relationship with his employees as a fair one.
Explanation:
Answer:
Government had made laws for killing animals or cutting plants. A person who is killing animals should be punished. Wildlife sanctuaries and National Parks are made for conserving animals and vegetation also.
Explanation:
I'm guessing it was because the<span> Maurya Dynasty, specifically the rule of Ashoka. Not 100% sure though. </span>
A prophet. Hope this helps
Ask yourself, instead, the opposite:
With the creation of the atomic bomb (there being 2 already, and 1 on the way), would it be necessary to risk millions of troops, billions of dollars worth of equipments, and trillion dollars in costs, to attack each island one by one, in hope of defeating Japan? The U.S. at Okinawa already knew how the Japanese would fight, with tooth & nails, and how surrender is not an option. With the ultimation of 2 atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima & Nagasaki respectifully, and the 3rd one being prepped, it not only gave the devastating feel, but also time for the Japanese government to ponder whether or not they should continue a war that they will lose anyways. In war, to save a life, 100% of the time a death must occur. It was necessary to bring destruction to Japan to save the lives of millions of Allied troops, and that in doing so, the A-bombs were used.