Answer:
Explanation:
Analogy is derived from a late middle English Greek language and it is used to describe a comparison of different things and is typical used to explain things in greater detail. For instance An analogy is like comparing an apple and an orange to describe the difference in colors. I have just used a analogy to describe an analogy. Antonym, this word is a mid 19th century word from the french and Greek languages. Ant meaning against and onuma meaning name. An antonym is a word that is the opposite meaning of another word. For instance Sad is the antonym of happy, since its meaning is the exact opposite. Synonym derives from late middle English by Latin and Greek. The different parts of the word are derived from the Greek alphabet onuma meaning name and sun meaning with. A synonym itself is a word or phrase that just means the same or so close to the same as another word and or phrase that it doesn't really matter. For instance Sleep is a another word for slumber, in other words its another word that means the same thing.
you need to touch up on grammar and spelling, i wrote it rather fast...but here you go...you may use this for anything you need...
just so you know by me allowing you use it is not plagorism
Mahatma Gandhi, one of the best minds in spirituality, writes about the truth of things in his autobiography <em>"The Story of My Experiments with Truth".</em> He supports his argument stating that God is the greatest good that humans must be seeking through our everyday thoughts and actions.
He invites human beings to act with truth and responsibility in our daily living, specifically in activities like politics and law, where you must act honestly and ethically.
<em>The Story of My Experiments with Truth</em> is a book that covers the life of Gandhi until 1921. Originally written in Gujarati, the book is divided into five parts: 1) Gandhi's childhood, 2)relationships with his wife and family, 3)his experience in South Africa, 4)World War I, 5)Freedom Fighting activities.
Answer:
I believe the answer is C because it builds on specific instance to come to a conclusion
In<em> President Barack Obama's argument about immigration</em>, it is used Pathos and Logos. We can see Pathos when he tries to get to the audience feelings of pity, disgrace, and empathy for those families who come into the U.S and have to face hardships such as racism. He's trying to provoke certain emotions talking about those families struggles and sufferings. He's using an emotional resource. Logos is seen when he talks about facts, about the fact that racism is still an issue in the U.S and that immigrants do are part of the American community as well. He's using logic and facts.
In<em> President Donald Trump's argument about immigration</em>, it is used Pathos, Ethos, and Logos. Pathos is seen when he tries to convey feelings of sorrow and pity for the American families who lose their jobs because of immigrants getting American's jobs. He tries to convey those feelings towards the hardships that American's face up to the immigrant's situation. Logos is seen in the last sentence Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. He uses logic to persuade the audience, he is trying to convince people that is statement is ethically correct and therefore, logical. Ethos is seen in the last and first sentence. He uses his authority to convince people about his argument being correct.
