Answer:
Merchants took advantage of the miners who had traveled so far from their homes. Because of their economic influences on our country, mines have been preserved as landmarks for today's citizens to visit and explore. The Indian population in California increased dramatically during the three- year period of the gold rush. Mining was an important opportunity for many Americans that unfortunately resulted in neglected crops and businesses in the cities they had vacated There were very few gold mines that resulted in successful expeditions for the miners
The Homestead Act of 1862 was not the first land-grant legislation in US history. In fact, the practice of governments awarding free land to settlers dates back to early colonial period, when the British encouraged settlement of the “New World” by granting settlers the claims to vast swathes of land. And ever since the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which established the Northwest Territory (modern-day Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin) and prohibited the extension of slavery into that territory, land-grant legislation has been inextricably tied to the issue of slavery. A competition ensued over the admission of free states and slave states into the Union
Homesteading was contentious because northerners and Republicans wanted to free up large plots of land to settlement by individual farmers, while Southern Democrats sought to make the lands of the west available only to slave-owners. Congress had passed a homestead act in 1860, but President James Buchanan, a Democrat, vetoed it. Only after the Southern states had seceded from the union in 1861 could the Homestead Act be passed. After Congress was emptied of Southern slaveholding legislators, President Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, signed the Homestead Act of 1862.
Explanation:
very hard in fact because when you go to prioritize you don't know which to put first , you think one is important then when you think 'bout it the other one is even more important then it all goes to down. hope this helps :) timechicken0 AWAY ;)
Answer: The events in Act I suggest that the ghost of Hamlet's father is real.
Explanation:
In the play, Hamlet encounters a ghost of his father, who tells him that his father has been murdered by his uncle, Claudius, who is now the new king and who has married Hamlet's mother. Hamlet also finds out that his mother was adulterous even before her husband's death.
The theory behind the ghost of Hamlet's father is open to different interpretation even today. It would, probably, make more sense to argue that the ghost is not a product of Hamlet's imagination. Although some of the critics claim that Hamlet has gone crazy due to the extreme sadness upon his father's death, and that the ghost is his hallucination, there is no hard evidence for this theory. Horatio, Marcellus, and Bernardo are actually the first characters to see the ghost (in <em>Act I, Scene I</em>), even before Hamlet does. It is not until <em>Act I, scene IV</em>, that Hamlet sees the ghost. As the witnesses discuss the appearance of the ghost among themselves, it implies that it is not a figment of Hamlet's imagination.