1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
8

In absorption costing, nonmanufacturing costs are assigned to units of product. True or False True False

Business
1 answer:
Andru [333]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The statement is: False.

Explanation:

Non-manufacturing costs are those not related to the production process of the company. It implies costs useful for the operations of the firm but does not have an impact on the process of creating a final good. Administrative salaries,  office supplies, and depreciation fall into this category.

Absorption costing describes an accounting approach in which all the manufacturing costs are assigned to the units produced.

Thus, as non-manufacturing costs are not related to the manufacturing process, they cannot be allocated within the units of production using the absorption costing method.

You might be interested in
Alex, brad, and carl are partners. the profit and rule sharing rule between them is 4:3:3 in the alphabetical order. the partner
goblinko [34]

If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.

Answer:

Alex- $40,000

Brad- $30,000

Carl- $30,000

Explanation:

For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.

Step 1: Add the ratios

i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10

Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula

(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000

For Alex, we have

(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.4 × $100,000

= $40,000

For Brad, we have

(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.3 × $100,000

= $30,000

For Carl, we have

(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.3 × $100,000

= $30,000

N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.

Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.

i hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
If the average wage paid to the worker was $20 in the year 1990 and $30 in the year 2000, then the average worker in the year 20
True [87]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Purchasing power is related to real income and not to nominal income. Even though workers had a $10 increase in their average nominal income, due to the effects of inflation, that increase does not necessarily reflect an improve in purchasing power.

The statement is false.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would make the best thesis statement for a debate? a. Art and music classes are great. b. Schools should
Novosadov [1.4K]
The best answer choice would be "B". This gives the main idea of what your debate would be about. It is also clear, and not biased or opinionated.

I hope this helps!
~cupcake
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hilary is a retired teacher who lives in Miami and does some consulting work for extra cash. At a wage of $50 per hour, she is w
Basile [38]

Answer:

Hilary is a retired teacher who lives in Miami and does some consulting work for extra cash. At a wage of $50 per hour, she is willing to work 10 hours per week. At $65 per hour, she is willing to work 19 hours per week.

Using the midpoint method, the elasticity of Hilary’s labor supply between the wages of $50 and $65 per hour is approximately 2.37 , which means that Hilary’s supply of labor over this wage range is elastic.

Explanation:

Midpoint elasticity = (Change in labor supplied / Average labor supplied) / (Change in wage rate / Average wage rate)

= [(19 - 10) / (19 + 10) / 2] / [$(65 - 50) / $(65 + 50) / 2]

= [9 / (29 / 2)] / [15 / (115 / 2)]

= (9 / 14.5) / (15 / 57.5)

= 0.62/0.26

Midpoint elasticity = 2.37

Once elasticity is greater than 1, supply of labor is Elastic.

5 0
3 years ago
When analyzing the key elements of a country's economic environment, it is best to apply a systems perspective?
Alenkasestr [34]
True. When you analyze the key elements of a country's economic perspective environment, it is best to apply a systems perspective. When you follow the systems perspective you should be taking all of the behaviors, attributes and actions of a system when it's in its environment. instead of individualizing people and things within, it's an overall evaluation of the system. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is appropriate to use the fixed assets turnover ratio to appraise firms' effectiveness in managing their fixed assets if and
    11·1 answer
  • How do government taxation policies affect the economy?
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose a 4 percent increase in price results in a 2 percent increase in the quantity supplied of a good. Calculate the price el
    13·1 answer
  • Fletcher Company collected the following data regarding production of one of its products. Compute the direct materials quantity
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Rosa Green estimates the cost of future projects for a large contracting firm. Rosa uses precisely the same techniques to est
    13·1 answer
  • Mishaps are normally caused by a series of conditions within a chain-of-events that set the stage for an active failure.
    11·2 answers
  • Ryan orders 16 dozen fishing lures from Strike Right for $375. When he gets the invoice, he is furious that $25 in freight charg
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following would most likely use a job order costing system? a.oil refinery b.company that manufactures chlorine for
    8·1 answer
  • What do you know, or have heard, about the U.S. Economy currently?
    13·2 answers
  • Croissants Corporation and Donuts Company transfer their assets to Edibles Inc., which manages the assets and distributes the pr
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!