Is the western frontier expansion the same thing as the westward expansion someone plz help

History

1 answer:

Troyanec [42]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Westward expansion: the 19th-century movement of settlers into the American West, began with the Louisiana Purchase and was fueled by the Gold Rush, the Oregon Trail and a belief in "Manifest Destiny."

Western Frontier expansion: with European colonial settlements in the early 17th century and ended with the admission of the last few territories as states in 1912. This era of massive migration and settlement was particularly encouraged by President Thomas Jefferson following the Louisiana Purchase, giving rise to the expansionist attitude known as "Manifest Destiny"

So saying that I would guess that they are many names for the same thing. They also both refer to "Manifest Destiny".

You might be interested in

Georgia’s charter was designed to keep it

vlada-n [284]

Answer:

the answer is dnf

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELPPP

NeTakaya

I think answer choice D makes the most sense.

6 0

2 years ago

Three of the following are features of absolutism which is not

tester [92]

It is important to note that this government is not based on the will of the people

6 0

3 years ago

Hemophilia is a genetic disease that has plagued the royal houses of europe since the time of queen victoria, who was a carrier.

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

That the Disease is gender specific

3 0

2 years ago

The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile

Alex777 [14]

Answer: E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0

3 years ago