Answer:
how did a gentleman in london deal with horse
Answer:
OBSERVATIONS
The Egyptians used chariots in war
INFERENCE
They were skilled horsemen
Explanation:
According to the picture/art, a number of men on chariots, wielding weapons appear to be charging into battle.
This suggests that the Egyptians made use of chariots during war and the inference drawn from this is that they were skilled horsemen and warriors.
The government hid the fact of how bad it really was
Eisenhower’s National Interstate and Defense Highways Act resulted in construction of 41,000 miles long highway, and it led to economic growth and many other benefits to the United States.
<h3>
What is Eisenhower’s National Interstate and
Defense Highways Act?</h3>
This act authorized one of the biggest public works project in the US history by building national highways signed by Eisenhower in 1956. The act authorized to built 41,000 miles long highway and budget allocated was $25 billion which was supposed to be complete in 10 years.
The interstate highway system had positive influence on the economic growth of the country, lead to reduction of traffic deaths and injuries, provided substantial benefits to users, and was an important factor in the nation's defense.
Therefore, it can be said that National Interstate and Defense Highways Act led to construction of 41,000 miles long highway and provided social, political, economic benefits to the United States.
Learn more about Eisenhower’s National Interstate and Defense Highways Act here:
brainly.com/question/22467961
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
- On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
- On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Happy 2019! :)
