In "To Autumn," John Keat is using an accent, hence the "hath," "thee," "oft," and "thy." Susan Hartley Swett on the other hand isn't using a specific "accent." She is only describing July, not making any emphasis on an accent. In "To Autumn," John Keat is using an upbeat tone, vividly describing the reds and oranges or autumn, whereas in "July," Susan Hartley Swett is using a more mellow tone. As here, quoted from "July," 'Underneath petals pink till the night stars wink At the sunset in the sky, It's July.' Notice how soft her language is here. And quoted from "To Autumn," 'Steady thy laden head across a brook; Or by a cider-press, with patient look, Thou watchest the last oozings, hours by hours.' See his more upbeat description of this season, and his impatience as well (Thou watchest the last oozings, hours by hours). In comparison, though, both are vividly describing with extremely descriptive language and style. You can literally picture yourself in their scenarios, under the soft stars in warm July, or feeling the crispness of Autumn.
Please mark as brainiest :)
Dogs that are trained to be a pair of eyes are for people who are mostly blind.
Special dog trainers train the dogs to guide the human
<span>D) If I give in to this foolish journey, I will be wasting my time.</span>
Strong feelings. Think about when you are really mad, you tend to use stronger language than you will do if you were´t mad.
If I am reading this correctly, you have been tasked with researching the "impact of perspective on historic events", meaning you will find how different thoughts and belief systems can impact historical events. Essentially, how do personal experiences, biases, beliefs, and/or attitudes affect the path of history?
In the materials, it shows you need a political figure's speech. These can often be found on YouTube or government websites. You will also need to editorials that review the figure's speech. These sources will be used as evidence for the essay component.
Your essay will have an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction should incorporate your findings regarding perspective and its role in the selected speech. The first body paragraph will summarize the speech audio/film, while the second and third paragraphs will review the two selected editorials. The conclusion should evaluate any 'loose ends' between the editorials, in addition to your general ideas on perspective's role in history.
I hope that helps!
