To write this argumentative essay, do the following:
- Take a side on the matter.
- If you support the argument for working and schooling at the same time, you have to state why you hold this belief.
- Bring out points to support it. Proponents can say that combining the two activities will make the students more resilient and fortified to survive harsh post-college working conditions. Opponents can say that combining the activities will cause a lot of distractions and possibly failure at school.
- End with a conclusion where the main point is strengthened.
<h3>What is an argumentative essay?</h3>
An argumentative essay is a kind of text where the writer takes a position on a topic and defends it with many points. The supporting details must be detailed enough to convince the reader of the author's points.
Anyone writing the essay above can choose to either support or oppose the point being made. For either side, solid points should be made to back the claims. Also, remember to stick to the word count and the other listed requirements in the text.
Learn more about an argumentative essays here:
brainly.com/question/11617771
#SPJ1
Answer:
History/records
Explanation:
If this isnt correct let me know what definition you mean!
Have a nice day!! :)
This statement is<span> jargon, </span>and jargon is the language used by certain professions, such as lawyers, doctors, etc.
So having this in mind, we can see that the sentence clearly used medical terms, so it has to be jargon.
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
