Answer:
Number of vats used is 3
Explanation:
Number of pounds used per hour, D = 195 ÷ 8
= 24.375 pounds per hour
Cycle time, T = 2.25
Inefficiency factor, e = 0.19
Material held in vats, C = 25 pounds
Now,
Let, n be total number of vats
Thus,
n = 
on substituting the respective values, we get
n =
or
n = 2.413 ≈ 3
Number of vats used is 3 [since vats cannot be in fraction]
COMMUNIST
Under the Communist System the number of choices in the market is directly related to government involvement in markets.
Communist system is a market system wherein all market decisions are made by the government.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. The two <span>participating countries were benefited by global trade in terms of </span><span>economic growth in both the countries. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
A legal description would provide the least ambiguous description of a property, for purposes of a deed.
A legal description is the geographical description of real estate that identifies its precise place, barriers, and any easements for the motive of a legal transaction, such as a transfer of possession. A criminal description is saved with the deed and filed with the county clerk or county tax assessor.
There are 3 types of legal descriptions of belongings typically used: metes and limits, government survey, and lot and block.
An avenue to cope with is not a legal description. road addresses regularly alternate, and that they had been never intended to offer a reliable description for purposes of deed education. An avenue to deal with isn't always sufficient to serve as a good enough criminal description of the actual estate.
Learn more about A legal description here
brainly.com/question/14414648
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. 75%.
Explanation:
The formula to compute the long-term debt to equity ratio is shown below:
= (Long term debt) ÷ (total shareholder equity) × 100
= ($360 ÷ $480) × 100
= 75%
All other information which is given in the question is not consider for the computation part. Hence, ignored it
We simply divide the long term debt with the total shareholder equity to find out the ratio between them
