Answer:
Social sciences (e.g., economics and psychology) are just as scientific as natural sciences (e.g., physics and biology). The difference is not in quality, but in what is studied and the limitations imposed by studying that. For example,
Subatomic particles are very well-behaved and easy to manage compared to economies and human minds. This makes it much easier to control studies and experiments of natural phenomena than social phenomena.
Ethically, we cannot experimentally manipulate humans or human activities as much as we can experimentally manipulate particles, atoms, molecules. This imposes challenges on social scientists’ methods that are not imposed on natural scientists’ methods.
So social scientists must do science differently than physicists. But both sets of scientists obtain and analyze novel data to test hypotheses about their domain. So they’re both doing science. It’s just that natural scientists’ encounter fewer ethical and logistical challenges than social scientists.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
To be there for that person or friend to be compassionate
Explanation:
There was a tiger, he was trying to hunt a deer, but he could not find the deer, he could not find the deer.
Answer:
recent, classical, Greek,updated and new
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
I hope this helps any! :)
Explanation:
<em>What is Diagon alley: </em>Diagon Alley is a cobblestoned wizarding alley and shopping area located in London, England behind a pub called the Leaky Cauldron.
<em>How does Harry get there: </em>
Harry and Hagrid exit into a small courtyard behind the Leaky Cauldron. While Harry reflects on peoples' reaction to him, Hagrid taps the wall bricks with his umbrella and a hole appears, growing bigger and bigger, forming an archway.
