Answer:
The Constitution of the United States, in its Article IV, establishes that all evidence obtained without a prior search warrant will be considered illegitimate and cannot be taken as valid at trial.
In this regard, it is necessary to differentiate the evidence in its material aspect and in its legal aspect: there is no doubt that the evidence, even taken illegitimately, shows a situation that actually occurred. Now, legally, all evidence has to be collected respecting due process, otherwise, constitutional guarantees will be violated and said collection will be as illegal as the crime charged to the accused.
Therefore, the police and other justice officials must endeavor to act in accordance with the law at the time of collecting evidence, respecting the Constitution in all its parts in order to prevent criminals from getting away with it.
Answer:
The founding fathers had mentioned the 39th clause of the Magna Carta, which was that the government can unjustly deprive any individual of “ life, liberty or property " and that no person would have legal action taken against them without the "lawful Judgment of his equals." The Magna Carta had ensured that the king would not be above the law; just how the Founding Fathers wanted it here. They wanted the government to abide by the law and respect the rights of the citizens.
The Magna Carta had also promised the people to not imprison them illegally and to also Ensure access to a trial. Also a lot like here. America has fair trials.
Explanation:
hope some of this helps a bit.
They advocated for different parts of the state