1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
castortr0y [4]
2 years ago
6

5. (2B) The Progressive Era was characterized by

History
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I want to say its the second one since there was a lot of push to fix corrupt government. If it's wrong, sorry!

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who proved that they could take on the british?
polet [3.4K]
I’m assuming this is about the revolutionary war? If so, than it’s the Americans!
6 0
3 years ago
How did the “Massacre at Mystic” on May 26, 1637 forever change the United States?
butalik [34]

Answer:

When English settlers arrived on the North American continent to start their lives anew, many of them gave little thought to the native peoples who had long inhabited these lands. The Puritan colonists who arrived in the Connecticut River Valley in the early 17th century quickly learned the benefits and necessities of trade and co-existence with the Pequot and other native groups. An initial period of accommodation and cultural mixing, however, turned bitter as the groups clashed over conflicting views of property, nature, division of labor, and the principles of warfare. Massacre at Mystic traces relations between these groups through the lens of a single day. On May 26, 1637 the English retaliated against the murder of one of their ownby viciously attacking a Pequot encampment. As this documentary explores this massacre, it captures the fateful consequences of these divergent worldviews and the tragic legacy left in its wake. Massacre at Mysticis a dramatic retelling of the development of Puritan and Pequot relationships.  Historians and Pequot descendents offer thoughtful commentary based on primary research and up-to-date historical interpretation. While there may have been a period of time in which Europeans and Native Americans could have built a cooperative society together, Massacre at Mysticuses this smaller story as a gripping example of why violence and force prevailed rather than co-existence. Rather than a simple tale of defeat, this program follows the present day Pequot as they have reconstructed a community based on new business enterprises and cultural endeavors. This program is an excellent historical lesson in understanding the development of the early colonies, the devastation of Native American peoples, and the patterns set during these formative years of contact.Curriculum Links:

Massacre at Mysticwould be an excellent addition to any middle school or high school class on American History, European History, World History, Environmental Studies, the History of Agriculture and Science and Technology.  It fulfills the following standards as outlined by the National Council for History Education: (1) Civilization, cultural diffusion, and innovation, (2) Conflict and cooperation, and (3) Human interaction with the environment

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the “Napoleonic Code”?:
den301095 [7]

Answer:

The last one in the choices

5 0
3 years ago
One example of a successful protest tactic used by the United Farm Workers in the late 1960s was a boycott of
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

One example of a successful protest tactic used by the United Farm Workers in the late 1960s was a boycott of:

table grapes grown in the Delano fields.

Explanation:

By using "the Delano grape strike" as the most notable for the effective implementation and adaptation of boycotts, the United Farm Workers were able to forge the unprecedented partnership between the Filipino and Mexican farm workers which eventually unionized farm labor.  The result was the creation of the UFW labor union.  Through its singular and innovative efforts and examples, the UFW revolutionized the farm labor movement in America.

5 0
3 years ago
Taxation without representation is tyranny. Why did James Otis make this statement? He believed that America's representatives i
ddd [48]

The right option is:

He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament" "Representation" in this context means having elected representatives in Parliament to make decisions on your behalf.

Explanation:

No taxation without representation" is a slogan beginning during the 1700s that compiled a primary grievance of the American colonists in the Thirteen Provinces, which was one of the principal foundations of the Western Revolution. James Otis was one of the most exciting and powerful champions of American conservatives during the 1760s, but his bright star dimmed during his lifetime and continues so today. He was born in West Barnstable on Cape Cod.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • World War II and the Cold War convinced US politicians to do which of the following? 
    11·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?
    9·2 answers
  • (PLEASE HELP) 
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed most to the growth of nationalism in the Balkans in
    12·1 answer
  • What was a major obstacle to drafting a new constitution at the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the government take steps towards the exercise of civil rights
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be the
    12·2 answers
  • When and where was Adolf Hitler born? *
    5·1 answer
  • Use your notes to identify the proxy war the United States was involved in<br> during the Cold War.
    15·1 answer
  • In what three ways did many women show that their perspectives of themselves had changed after the women's suffrage movement?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!