<span>When you flash forward and skip to the end result, there are many ways to imagine what could have happened in between. This structure can be either effective or not; but it depends on each individual case. In this instance, it wasn't necessary to know exactly what happened in between about the details of Sergei's decision because the most prominent point of this story was the result of what happened in the beginning. It leaves more to the imagination and truly leaves the reader thinking about Sergei's decision; it doesn't particularly matter how he arrived there. We know he was in a challenging position and no matter what he was going to face challenges leading up to the ending.</span>
Reagan claimed that the in the future, the space program would be not only much safer, but also a source of pride despite all the mishaps from Challenger.
His claimed is absolutely credible and supported by logical, since the empiric evidence shows us that sacrifices and adversities are romanticized throughout history. Not only that, explorers and inventors tend to be exalted in future generations. Columbus is still talked about and so will be Neil Armstrong for stepping on the moon.
In addition to that, it is noted that technology evolves faster every year and safety goes along with it. Cars, for example, are much safer with better break technology and airbags, for example. Space exploration, even though it is still being perfected, is so much safer today than it was when it all started and will be much safer in the future.
Answer:
I CANT SEE THE UNDERLINED PART sorry abt the caps
Explanation:
