Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
In “Better Never to Have Met at All” the author argues that the two main characters in Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” shouldn’t have met. In the essay he summarizes the story of the play, and mark’s points when Romeo and Juliet influences the people’s lives and not for the better. Examples of that include the death of Mercutio, Tybalt, and more.
The correct answer is D. the world is not a beautiful place. It is not B because they are not confused by evil, rather by struggle and flight, and armies clashing by night.