The correct answer is B) by igniting debate over the expansion over slavery.
<em>The Manifested Destiny deepened divisions among US citizens by igniting debate over the expansion over slavery.</em>
For one reason or the other, American citizens have been divided through US history. The debate over slavery was a difficult issue that could not be resolved after the Civil War and after the loss of so many lives. The government tried to manage the situation with the creation of acts such as the Missouri Compromise, but the differences between people in the South and the North were enormous regarding slavery. Slavery was an important part of the economy for the Confederated States. So the inevitable happened, an armed confrontation between the Union Army and the Confederated Army. So yes, the Manifested Destiny deepened divisions among US citizens by igniting debate over the expansion over slavery.
Answer:
Hope this Helps i love Thomas Jefferson he is pretty cool not gonna lie
Explanation:
How the Declaration Came About
Map of the British Colonies in North America in 1763Map of the British Colonies in North America in 1763
America's declaration of independence from the British Empire was the nation's founding moment. But it was not inevitable. Until the spring of 1776, most colonists believed that the British Empire offered its citizens freedom and provided them protection and opportunity. The mother country purchased colonists' goods, defended them from Native American Indian and European aggressors, and extended British rights and liberty to colonists. In return, colonists traded primarily with Britain, obeyed British laws and customs, and pledged their loyalty to the British crown. For most of the eighteenth century, the relationship between Britain and her American colonies was mutually beneficial. Even as late as June 1775, Thomas Jefferson said that he would "rather be in dependence on Great Britain, properly limited, than on any nation upon earth, or than on no nation."
A provisions of the Us neutrality act of 1935 : prohibited the sale of arms to any belligerent nations
The act of helping in weapon supply can be deemed as an act of favouritsm and couldn't be considered as neutral
Hope this helps!
Answer:
the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country
Explanation:
