1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
10

Should international law should define rules of war? Why or why not?

History
2 answers:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
5 0
I believe the answer is no
Marina CMI [18]3 years ago
3 0
No because international laws are based on what good is for the people. When there is war it rarely is based on what is good for the people but fighting for what’s right and fighting for justice. Therefore making it difficult to focus on international laws in war situations.
You might be interested in
What occurred in December 07, 1941
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

At 07 December 07,1941 Japan planes attack US at Hawaii Territory.

It kills 2300+ Americans

3 0
4 years ago
How did the united states go beyond the idea of manifest destiny ?
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:How did manifest destiny fundamentally change America?

Manifest Destiny, a phrase coined in 1845, expressed the philosophy that drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion. Manifest Destiny held that the United States was destined—by God, its advocates believed—to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What does isolationism mean
Veseljchak [2.6K]
A policy of remaining apart from the affairs or interest of other groups, especially the political affairs of other countries.
4 0
4 years ago
What different military powers do the president and congress have?
anyanavicka [17]
Ooo simple 
<span>Only Congress has the right to declare war, but the president is the supreme.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'll give you brainly if you answer correctly
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

President Andrew Jackson issued a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina also known as the “Nullification Proclamation” that disputed a states' right to nullify a federal law. The Compromise Tariff of 1833 was eventually accepted by South Carolina and ended the nullification crisis.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the rational way of thinking, taught by Aristotle almost die by the 300 AD?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Liu Bang adapt a political outlook somewhere in between Confucianism and Legalism?
    12·1 answer
  • What was one obstical to proving the articles of confederation
    8·1 answer
  • Around 9,000 years ago, where did farming first start in the Americas?
    6·1 answer
  • ASAP NO ROCKY I NEED THIS NOW
    10·2 answers
  • How does the text help readers understand the conection between peaceful protest and positive change ?
    6·1 answer
  • Matthew underwent a criminal trial on the charge of kidnapping. At the end of the trial, the jury declared Matthew innocent beca
    8·1 answer
  • Where's Brownie Explain how the narrator's point of the view affect how events are described using details from the text?
    14·1 answer
  • Did the Turks have control of the holy by the end of the crusades?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the area connecting Asia and North America called? *. A peninsula
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!