Economically it had a positive impact on the South, it allowed their economy not to be solely reliant on agriculture. However, as far as their society goes there wasn't a change in their belief system in their stance on African Americans. Many still considered them as second citizens until the Civil Rights Movement.
This is just a guess but maybe he feels out of place in the US.
Shows how much a company's assets that are financed through debt
With regards to whether imperialism was a fair excuse for the Industrial Revolution, the answer is that <u>it was not. </u>
<u />
<h3>What was the relationship between imperialism and the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
- Raw materials were needed to produce more goods and so colonies were acquired to get these goods cheaply.
- New markets were needed to sell the goods produced as well.
Both of these are not good enough excuses for imperialism because these nations could have engaged in fair and mutually beneficial trade that would have led to both the colonized nations, and themselves, developing.
Find out more on imperialism at brainly.com/question/353575.
Answer:
Debatable, but the answer you're likely looking for is Karl Marx and Fredrich Engel's 1848 document on political theory, the <em>Manifesto of the Communist Party. </em>
Explanation:
Now known as <em>The Communist Manifesto, </em>the document contains Marx and Engel's analysis of communism and the class-struggle. Within, Marx writes, "The supremacy of the proletariat will cause them to vanish still faster. United action, of the leading civilized countries at least, is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of the proletariat." While the term "world revolution" isn't explicitly used, the passage eludes to it's underlying concepts.
Feel free to message me if you need anything clarified
