1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
3 years ago
9

Was the Ottoman vs Safavid Rivalry political or religious-based? Explain your answer

History
1 answer:
riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The history of Ottoman–Safavid relations (Persian: روابط عثمانی و صفوی) started with the establishment of Safavid dynasty in Persia (Iran) in the early 16th century. The initial Ottoman–Safavid conflict culminated in the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, and was followed by a century of border confrontation. In 1639, Safavid Persia and Ottoman Empire signed the Treaty of Zuhab which recognized Iraq in Ottoman control, and decisively parted the Caucasus in two between the two empires. For most of it, the Zuhab treaty was a consolidation of the Peace of Amasya of about a century earlier.[1]

Persian and Ottoman Empire in 1661

Until the 18th century, the struggle between the Safavid version of Shia Islam and the Ottoman Turkish version of Sunni Islam had continued to remain an important dimension of the combative relationships between the two major empires.[2] In the early 18th century, Persian–Ottoman peace negotiations introduced a new concept of inter-Muslim relations whereby sovereign states could co-exist as autonomous parts of the Islamic world community.[3] Although the further relations were guided by the mutual fear of weakness and distrust, it wasn't until 1847 when Qajar Persia and Ottoman Empire reached a substantial peace Treaty of Erzurum, starting a century of peace,[2] after centuries of rivalry.

You might be interested in
I need help! it’s due tomorrow morning!!
Tresset [83]
An economic system in which private business operates in competition and largely free of state control.
7 0
3 years ago
What did Italy, Germany, and Japan have in common during the 1930s?. . A.They supported free trade.. B.Each opposed Fascism.. C.
Sever21 [200]
The one thing that Italy, Germany, and Japan had in common during the 1930's time periods were that they were all imperialistic. That will make the correct answer to be C. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of radio free europe?
Mariana [72]
So the US Government can fund broadcasting news to Europe
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The “other half” that Jacob Riis referred to in his 1890 book, How the Other Half Lives, were the
solong [7]

he answer is C). working poor


hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the closest synonym for the word momentum?
Ainat [17]

Answer:

energy

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help with #7!!!! I really did help!
    6·1 answer
  • What were three of the most important social reforms that followed the industrial revolution
    13·2 answers
  • President Kennedy's domestic plan for the nation was called
    10·2 answers
  • What are some other ways colonists could have accomplished their goals without the use of slaves
    7·2 answers
  • What is it important to study economics
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What do you think is meant by The Great Realisation? When looking back on the
    5·1 answer
  • which factors indicate that there was an economic depression in the united states after the revolutionary war?​
    15·1 answer
  • At the Constitutional Convention, which plan
    12·2 answers
  • From what you know about the Divine Rights of Kings, what is the difference between that perspective and the perspective of Enli
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the Mongol ruler who conquered China and established the largest land empire in history?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!