1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
3 years ago
9

Was the Ottoman vs Safavid Rivalry political or religious-based? Explain your answer

History
1 answer:
riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The history of Ottoman–Safavid relations (Persian: روابط عثمانی و صفوی) started with the establishment of Safavid dynasty in Persia (Iran) in the early 16th century. The initial Ottoman–Safavid conflict culminated in the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, and was followed by a century of border confrontation. In 1639, Safavid Persia and Ottoman Empire signed the Treaty of Zuhab which recognized Iraq in Ottoman control, and decisively parted the Caucasus in two between the two empires. For most of it, the Zuhab treaty was a consolidation of the Peace of Amasya of about a century earlier.[1]

Persian and Ottoman Empire in 1661

Until the 18th century, the struggle between the Safavid version of Shia Islam and the Ottoman Turkish version of Sunni Islam had continued to remain an important dimension of the combative relationships between the two major empires.[2] In the early 18th century, Persian–Ottoman peace negotiations introduced a new concept of inter-Muslim relations whereby sovereign states could co-exist as autonomous parts of the Islamic world community.[3] Although the further relations were guided by the mutual fear of weakness and distrust, it wasn't until 1847 when Qajar Persia and Ottoman Empire reached a substantial peace Treaty of Erzurum, starting a century of peace,[2] after centuries of rivalry.

You might be interested in
Read the quote. Then select the statement that is true about the quote.
torisob [31]
Your answer would most DEFINITELY be D., because it is already stated that "men", (all people), easily abuse the right of liberty and may not be given 100% trust, so the government must make sure to help protect the right from the selfishness of the people's use of that right. :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is the most accurate comparison of William Lloyd Garrison and Fredrick Douglas?
stich3 [128]

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ASAP PLZZZ help
maksim [4K]

Answer:

English nation because it changed one of the minor thinking of the world that is the slavery

Brainliest plzzz

6 0
3 years ago
The Silk Road was:
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

a trade route that connected Rome in the west to China in the east

5 0
2 years ago
What action greatly increased America’s supply of natural resources
marusya05 [52]
The purchase of Alaska from Russia.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was Cortes considered a hero in Spain?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the most likely reason the germans followed the thames during their air raids?
    7·2 answers
  • The purpose of a "general election" is to
    10·2 answers
  • What did Jefferson Davis do before war
    6·1 answer
  • What specifically was dr. martin luther king jr. speaking out against when he made this statement in 1958? “i could never adjust
    9·2 answers
  • Read this passage:
    11·2 answers
  • Pleasee help me:(
    15·1 answer
  • Complete the equation to show which two factors are usually compared in making a benefit-cost analysis
    14·2 answers
  • How did the Dawes Act and the Curtis Act affect the Native
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT in the<br> Constitution?<br> A Laws<br> B. Rights<br> C. Treaties
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!