The correct answer is B. The potential for the results to improve the world is not evident.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical perspective ad theory that focuses on increasing the well-being and happiness of individuals while decreasing suffering or pain. Also, for utilitarians, the practical uses and results prevail over other factors. Due to this, utilitarians might argue science is not valuable because a big part of it is understanding how natural phenomenons work, and this might be considered to lack practical uses or to help the world improve. Thus, the reason for a utilitarian to argue against the value of science is that "the potential for the results to improve the world is not evident".
Many immigrants came to the United States were seeking freedom and a better surrounding. They wanted better jobs and religous freedom.
The answer to your question is mercantilism. After the Renaissance, mercantilism was the economic policy of the new nations. This economic system was widely used in Europe in the fifteen hundreds and sixteen hundreds which favored equal trading of imports and exports. The national wealth was measured based by the amount of gold and silver.
A shortage of money
-There was a limited supply gold and other hard currency across the colonies. Also, Paper money was not issued by the government and was not recognized across colonial boundaries. As a result, exchange was mostly conducted through barter trade
Answer:
I could be wrong im not entirely sure but I think the answer would be automobile