Answer:
first one creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration
Answer:
Answer is Option 2: U.S. leaders worked to improve relations with foreign countries to protect its access to natural resources.
Explanation:
United States has always wanted to maintained its relations with foreign ministers to protect its natural resources. This is why U.S concerned regarding Middle East in 1970s. It is believed to be foreign policy of U.S. to dominate Middle East. Oil has always been abundant in Middle East so U.S. has always tried to keep access to such natural resources.
Other options like U.S worked to bring peace and encouraged the creation of OPEC as per options 1 and 3 are incorrect. Option 4 is also incorrect.
An elected official who votes the way his or her constituents would want is a delegates.
A paradigm of a representative democracy is the delegate system of representation. In this setup, voters choose their representatives to serve as delegates on their behalf. These delegates solely serve as a spokesperson for their state's or constituency's desires, and the only autonomy they enjoy is the right to vote for the state's actual representatives.
Representatives under this arrangement are constrained by mandatory mandates and do not have the luxury of acting in accordance with their conscience. In essence, the representative speaks for people who are (literally) absent.
to learn more about Delegate here
brainly.com/question/10594256
#SPJ4
Option B
If one were somehow able to measure everything that makes up job performance, he or she would be measuring: ultimate criteria
<u>Explanation:</u>
The ultimate criterion resides as a rigorously conceptual construct that cannot be estimated or perceived. To propose it and to explain the association among the consequences esteemed by the team and the worker actions that guide to these consequences.
One of the usual tenacious ideas a determined criterion is lacking is the multidimensionality of the ultimate criterion, which merges latent, active, and unique dimensionality. The ultimate criterion can lead people to the general dominant constancies of their acts. They can support to present a justification for proceeding to give and for driving high-performance levels.