Answer:
The author believes that the pilot didn't listen well enough. She states that "Communication failures led to 1,744 deaths in American hospitals between 2009 and 2013".
Explanation:
Explanation:
presentation is to present something about given topic or it is the explanation of topic in front of people
Answer: Nothing
Explanation: That is my answer looked it up and it's nothing
In the poem "Traveling Through the Dark," the types of figurative language used and their impact on the poem are as follows:
1. Alliteration:
In lines 1 and 2, the author repeats the "d" sound in "deer / dead". This impacts the poem because it emphasizes the sound of the thud the car makes when it hits the deer.
2. Extended metaphor:
The whole poem is a metaphor for the conflict between nature and technology. The pregnant doe has been killed due to technology, hit by a car.
Now, the speaker must decide to push her into the river so that her dead body will not cause more accidents.
3. Personification:
The author personifies the car (gives it a human quality or action) when he says, "The <u>car aimed ahead</u> its lowered parking lights." This intensifies the focus on technology and how it affects nature. It is as if the car <u>has a life of its own.</u>
- The poem "Traveling Through the Dark," by William E. Stafford, is based on a real-life experience of the author.
- The poem is an extended metaphor, which means it serves as a comparison. The dead deer and the car represent nature and technology.
- The extended metaphor shows how technology has a deadly impact over nature.
- The author uses personification to talk about the car, which makes it seem that the car has its own intents, its own will.
- The alliteration (repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of close words) in "deer / dead" emphasizes the sound of the car hitting the deer. As a consequence, it emphasizes death.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/19491341?referrer=searchResults
It hasn't and probably it never will.
It is also philosophically dangerous to equate civilization to good and savagery to evil. After all, we as so called civilized men would be inherently biased in assuming that we represent the positive side of this equation while nature's savages, or that which is the antitheses of what's civilized, represents or equates evil.
Binary comparisons often lack the subtlety to portray the complexity of life and its myriad shades of gray.
At best we could say that evidence suggests civilization seems a more desirable option than savagery.
