Tax Reductions Lead to Economic Growth in the 1920s
would be the best headline for presidential address.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In the 1920s, the citizens of the US and business people continued to pay a lot of tax and this disheartened investors from launching new enterprises while existing businesses struggled not to shut down.
It prompted the Government to seek a way to overcome the problem and eventually managed to reduce the taxes collected by the government in order to minimize the tax liability on US residents. Tax cuts have led to economic growth.
Tax breaks in 1920s Increased federal wages and economic development. The Bush admin also indicated that the progressive income tax cuts which were introduced in 2001 should be implemented fully this year. Increases in federal income tax rates have affected the behaviour of individuals and companies.
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
The War of 1812 was actually fought in multiple places including North America, the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the East Coast of the US, and the Gulf Coast of the US. Hope this helps!!
<span> Plato believe that philosophers would make the best rulers because, according to Plato, they have knowledge of truth that others do not and only they can make crucial decisions about what is best for the city-state. To Plato, a poor ruler would be the opposite of that. that is the right answer.</span>
