Answer:
A) They would be indifferent, as Sally's income net of costs equals $25,000.
Explanation:
Sally's economic profit = accounting profit - opportunity costs
- accounting profit = $12,000
- opportunity costs = $25,000 - $15,000 in lost salaries + $2,000 (lost investment revenue) = $12,000
economic profit = $12,000 - $12,000 = $0
Since the economic profit is $0, Sally should be indifferent between running her own business or working for someone else.
The correct answer is: "I would recommend her not to increase the price, because with an elastic demand function this will cause a great decrease in the quantity demanded by consumers".
The demand function represents the quantity of a certain good or service that consumers are willing to purchase in the market at different price levels. The law of demand states that there is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded (ceteris paribus, hence, given that the rest remains equal). <u>Therefore, when the price charged decreases, the amount that consumers are willing to purchase increases. </u>
In turn, the elasticity of the demand function measures the sensitiveness of the quantity demanded by consumers when there is a certain price change. If the demand function is elastic it means that a price variation would generate an even larger variation (in the inverse direction of course!) in the quantity demanded. <u>This is the case of the lemonade stand therefore the girl should not increase prices because this will not help her to reach her objective quicke</u>r, as she would loss a greater proportion of units sold than the size of the price increase that would have allowed her to earn more per unit.
This kind of program could be like rehabilitation such as may be provided in a half-way house for people coming out of jail which is designed to help the ex-prisoners to stop the use of illicit drugs, improve socialization skills and find meaningful employment so they can get back on their feet again. Where I live in the province of BC in Canada, it is law that a person can not be barred from employment if his offence was not related to his/her work.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (Enhanced efficiency).
Explanation:
- Enhanced Efficiency seems to be an innovation that decreases the probability of discharge of that same object surface. It is indeed a definitive version of an effective. The whole bonus is going to take 2 elements in such a gizmo. It could be generated in the gizmos of guns, shields, and devices.
- It would be the most immediate consequence of direct exports providing economic assets to regions where they'll be required.
Other given choices are not related to the given scenario. So that Option A seems to be the appropriate choice.
Increase price value profit becomes higher than price, what happens to a company
