The statement of fact which most clearly suggests that the account is biased is; Choice C; The governor also supports laws that fight crime and lower taxes for the middle class.
<h3>Statements of Fact</h3>
From the excerpt, it was brought to notice that;
- Our wise governor supported the law against hunting, and now we're paying the price.
However, one must be conscious that the account is biased because it fails to recognise the he fact that the governor also supports other laws that fight crime and lower taxes for the middle class.
Read more on Statement of fact;
brainly.com/question/338928
If this is a true or false question, then this is definitely false.
Although Polonius does send Reynaldo to Paris, he doesn't send him to encourage Laertes to return home. He sends him in order to spy on his son, to see if he's doing okay, and if he's not drinking and squandering his money on his vices.
The relationship between wary and trusting that they are "antonyms". -Morgan :3
The correct answer is A. Change "obviously creepy" to "unsettling."
Explanation:
In general terms, a text is considered objective in the case it includes only facts and avoids personal judgments, perceptions, and options. In the case of the sentence "All of these descriptions mark Pearl as enchanting but also strange and obviously creepy" the phrase "obviously creepy" includes a personal perception and judgements from the author and therefore this should be changed to a more neutral one based on the facts such as "unsettling" as this describes the particular behavior of Pearl without judging her as "creepy". On the other hand, replacing this by "poorly behaved" still includes a personal judgment and the word "enchanting" is objective, which means it does not need to be changed. According to this, the change that would make the sentence more objective is "change "obviously creepy" to "unsettling".