Answer:
b. The availability heuristic
Explanation:
In psychology, the term <u>availability heuristic </u>refers to the tendency that people have to rely on immediate examples (usually close to them) when they have to evaluate a broader topic or concept. In other words, people make judgements based on specific examples that come to their mind.
In this example, two of Mariah's friends lost their jobs. Now Mariah is grossly overestimating the national unemployment rate. We can see that <u>Mariah is relying on immediate examples like what just happened to her two best friends to form an opinion on the national unemployment rate. </u>Therefore, this would be an example of availability heuristic.
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
Answer:
After his demise, she wedded his child, Gaozong (r. 649-683 CE) and became ruler associate however really was the force behind the sovereign. At the point when Gaozong passed on in 683 CE, Wu assumed responsibility for the public authority as sovereign matron, setting two of her children on the seat and eliminating them nearly as fast.
Explanation:
U decide!
