<span>
</span>
Wallace defended segregation and this were his main arguments:
<span>-The Constitution did not require white and African American children to attend the same schools.
-Social separation of blacks and whites was a regional custom; the states should be left free to regulate their own social affairs.
-Segregation was not harmful to black people.
-Whites were making a good faith effort to equalize the two educational systems. But because black children were still living with the effects of slavery, it would take some time before they were able to compete with white children in the same classroom.
Hope this helps!! :)
</span>
Good judgment comes from CONSIDERING THE OUTCOMES OF YOUR DECISIONS.
In every decision making process, we need to consider the pros and cons of each option. The best option will be the one where its pros weigh more than its cons. Considering the outcomes will not only be done by thinking about how to attain the end-goal but also to know the effects of the steps we make in attaining said goal. An option might be beneficial at first glace but might expose negative side effects upon deeper analysis. Thus, good judgment must be practice to benefit not one but all.
<span> think the answer your teachers are looking for is D, but I disagree. Both of these concepts date back to ancient Greece or earlier. They resurfaced around the 18th century. </span>
Cesar Chavez led the successful boycotts of fruits and vegetables to put pressure on California growers to sign union contracts.
The South was fighting a defensive war. The confederates prefer a defensive doctrine to defeat the numerically superior Union forces and to invite foreign powers especially Great Britain in their side thus winning the war against the Union forces in the American civil war.
