Answer:
<h2>The court claims that the purpose of the 14th Amendment is “to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law” but not “to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>
<em><u>PLEASE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>MARK</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> FOLLOW</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> LOTS</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>OF</u></em><em><u> LOVE</u></em><em><u> FROM</u></em><em><u> MY</u></em><em><u> HEART'AND</u></em><em><u> SOUL</u></em><em><u> DARLING</u></em><em><u> TEJAS</u></em><em><u>W</u></em><em><u>INI</u></em><em><u> SINHA</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>HERE </u></em><em><u>❤️</u></em></h2>
Yes you would like to buy this car named da baby car
I don't think that it falls under the main fallacies, but it is an assumption that all pet shops user puppy mills
