Amendment<span> I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of </span>religion<span>, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the </span>freedom of<span> speech, or of the </span>press<span>; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
The benefit a country of the difference in value between a nation's exports animports, including both goods and services. ... Shortfall that occurs when the total value of a nation's imports is higher than the total value of its exports. Balance of payments. A measure of the total flows of money into or out of a country.
