Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Amiraneli [1.4K]

2 years ago

7

is the view of the global economic system as divided between certian industrialized nations that control wealth and developing c

ountries that are controlled and exploited

1 answer:

Natali5045456 [20]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

I do not understand your question explain further

You might be interested in

In Year 1, the actual budget deficit was $150 billion and the cyclically adjusted deficit was $125 billion. In Year 2, the actua

olasank [31]

Answer:

b.fiscal policy became less expansionary

Explanation:

Because, the actual budget deficit (government spending less taxes and other) decreases the State decrease theri participation in the aconomy by the 20 millons difference.

This means their welfare programs, military, political, public works and other spending decreases. It could also mean the taxes were raised to make up for the deficit.

In both, the government policy contracts a little bit.

4 0

3 years ago

Q 2.3: mason corporation purchased a piece of land 5 years ago when the price of land was low. it plans to develop the land into

TiliK225 [7]

On their classified balance sheet, Mason Corporation would classify this land as <u>"a long term investment".</u>

A long-term investment refers to an account on the asset side of an organization's monetary record that speaks to the organization's speculations, including stocks, bonds, land and money, that it expects to hold for over a year. The long-term investment account varies to a great extent from the short-term investment in that the transient speculations will no doubt be sold, while the long haul speculations may never be sold.

4 0

2 years ago

Suppose that France and Denmark both produce fish and stained glass. France's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained gl

andriy [413]

Answer:

France has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass.

Denmark has a comparative advantage in production of fish.

France will gain from trade as long as it gets more than 3 pounds of fish for each pane of stained glass.

Denmark can gain from trade if it gets more than 0.09 pane of stained glass for each pound of fish it exports.

4 pounds of fish per pane of stained glass.

7 pounds of fish per pane of stained glass.

Explanation:

France and Denmark both produce fish and stained glass.

France's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass

= 3 pounds of fish

Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass

= 11 pounds of fish

France's opportunity cost of producing a pound of fish

= $\frac{1}{3}$

= 0.33 pane of stained glass

Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a pound of fish

= $\frac{1}{11}$

= 0.09 pane of stained glass

France has a lower opportunity cost of producing stained glass so we can say it has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass. While Denmark has a comparative advantage in the production of fish.

If both countries start to trade with each other, France will gain from trade as long as it gets more than 3 pounds of fish for each pane of stained glass.

While Denmark can gain from trade if it gets more than 0.09 pane of stained glass for each pound of fish it exports.

Both the countries will gain from trade if the trade price lies between their opportunity cost. both countries will gain from trade if the price is 4 pounds of fish per pane of stained glass or 7 pounds of fish per pane of stained glass.

8 0

2 years ago

Slim made a single deposit of $5,000 in an account that pays 7.2% in 2015. What equal-sized annual withdrawals can Slim make fro

evablogger [386]

Answer:

annual withdrawals is $1,393.87

Explanation:

given data

Amount Deposited = $5,000

Annual Interest Rate = 7.2%

First withdrawal = 2020

last withdrawal = 2025

solution

we consider equal sized annual withdrawals = x

so we can say that Amount Deposited amount will be as

$5,000 = $\frac{x}{(1+0.72)^5} + \frac{x}{(1+0.72)^6} + \frac{x}{(1+0.72)^7} + \frac{x}{(1+0.72)^8} + \frac{x}{(1+0.72)^9} + \frac{x}{(1+0.72)^{10}}$ ..........1

we take common here $\frac{x}{(1+0.72)^{4}}$

so

$5,000 = $\frac{x}{(1+0.72)^{4}} \times ( \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^1} + \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^2} + \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^3} + \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^4} + \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^5} + \frac{1}{(1+0.72)^{6}} )$

solve it we get

x = $1,393.87

so that annual withdrawals is $1,393.87

7 0

2 years ago

A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would

IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

With mitigation: NPV =$36,670,000, IRR= 15,24%

Without mitigation: NPV= $ 42,000,000, IRR= 19,86%

Explanation:

To calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) we have to sum the present value of a project´s cash flows (positive and negative cashflows). To do so, we need: the number of periods of the project, the discount rate, cost of captal or WACC, and the future values of the cash flows. Then we apply the formula attached.

To calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) we have to find the discount rate, cost of capital or WACC that makes the NPV equal to cero. That means we have to find a rate in which the investor do not create or destroy value, only recovers the investment. I attached the formula.

But, this is better if we use excel:

First we copy the cash flows of the two projects. To find the NPV we use the financial formula "NPV" in this way:

"=NPV(rate;cash flows from year 1 to year 5)+ cash flow of year 0"

To find the IRR we use the financial formula "IRR" in this way:

"=IRR(cash flows from year 0 to year 5)"

I attached the excel figure.

6 0

3 years ago