Explanation:
Reread Nick's dialogue with Jordan at the end of the excerpt from The Great Gatsby. Do you think that Nick trusts Jordan's ideas about Gatsby? What makes you think so? Cite specific textual evidence to support your answer.
Assuming that the bolded word is winner, the correct answer is object complement.
The word winner refers to the word <em>play - </em>and given that the word play is the direct object of this sentence, then the word <em>winner </em>will be its complement - it will complete it, and answer the question What did the critics declare the play to be?
It cannot be a predicate nominative because it is not preceded by a verb. It cannot be a direct object because that is <em>the play. </em>It cannot be a predicate adjective because it is a noun, not an adjective.
Answer:
Please ask questions that make more sense!
Explanation:
Basically you are going to put this together so 3,167. What I did to figure this out was 3000+160+7=3,167. I hope this helped. :) Brainlest answer please?
Answer:
If you are talking about using technology to translate one language to another then look below
Explanation:
Example: English to French
Technology today allows us to set up inputs for languages so that when we talk into our devices, it translated.
If we go with our example, your inputs would be English and French. When you speak into your device you will talk in English and it translates to French.
This is very useful if you go to France. If you want to go for a vacation there, instead of learning the language for the short period of time that you'd be there, you could just take your phone and when you need something translated for a person who speaks French, you just need to talk into your phone and it does the translating for you.
Hope this helps (:
