The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
"Laissez-faire" can be translated as an attitude of letting things be. As an Economic Doctrine it means the abstention by the government from interfering with the free market. This is also known as the "laissez-faire capitalism", which is completely oppossed to economic regulations.
It marked the first peaceful transfer of power between political parties in American history. (the first option.)
A decline in trade is the economic theory given for the fall of the Indus Valley civilization.
Can you please provide the answers that you have? That would be a big help to solve this problem! Thanks
404~
