To study history artifacts are needed and often they are lost to history because they have been buried and not found, are under water, are broken or ruined in some way, the site has been raided by thieves and items taken, war often interrupts digs or the archeological sites are destroyed by armies and information is lost. These are just a few things that makes it hard to study early humans and things are found all the time that historians learn from.
Historians need good sources (preferably, written sources) on which to base their studies. If early societies did not leave any written information , historians have to go by other indications like the remnants of villages and temples and perhaps some drawings or carvings. Sometimes these give an indication how societies were (or might have been) organized, but without written confirmation you can never be completely sure. so is that help full or not
The answer is true. Have a good day :)
<span>Despite his personal opposition to slavery, when President Abraham Lincoln took office in 1861 he insisted that his constitutional duty was to keep the nation together, not to abolish slavery. He conducted the first year of the war with the goal of reuniting the Union, but wartime events, including heavy military losses and the many slaves who escaped behind Union battle lines, forced him to contend with the issue of slavery. He issued a preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862 and the final version on January 1, 1863, fundamentally changing the meaning of the war.</span>
Answer:
Replaced at the height of his power, Richard had been compromised by the narrowness of his own power base and his personal inability to live up to the image that he created for the crown. He failed because he misread the signs around him, and was unable to raise the monarchy as an institution with himself at its head.
hope it helps :)
