Answer:
When Macbeth killed Duncan he was not able to sleep due to the terrorizing thoughts that haunted him at night. His dreams were clouded by the murder of duncan and the guilt he carried with him. After killing Duncan Macbeth realized that he has “slashed the snake but not killed it
Explanation:
Answer:
1. analogy
2. A. It helps the reader better visualize just how many young people work in the fast-food industry.
D. It supports the reasoning that the fast-food industry values a younger workforce over adult workers.
Explanation:
By comparing the two situations, Schlosser is using the analogy, which is, basically, explaining one situation with another, which is more familiar, with the purpose of clarification.
Since people are, it's safe to guess, not familiar with the situation inside the fast food industry, the author compares it to a movie, which is probably more familiar to the audience, in order to explain his claim.
The information Schlosser wanted to convey through this analogy is, that, just like in the movie, where all actors are children, most of workers in the fast food industry are teenagers and students. In his text, he also states that many of them don't speak English well, that they are immigrants and students who accept working with minimal wages.
Of course, lesser wages are bonus for the hungry-for-profit industry, which explains why it values younger over adult workers.
Answer:
Complex sentence
Explanation:
A complex sentence consists of one independent clause and a dependent clause.
"Sally showed up late to the yoga studio" is an independent clause since it is complete. Sally is the subject and showed is the verb.
"since she had a hard time finding parking." is a dependent clause since it started with a conjunction, since. This conjunction would be called subordinating conjunction.
The people and their interactions in the text includes how people wanted to squash their cultural identity but still had differences crammed in their backpacks.
<h3>What is the interaction between people and ideas in the text?</h3>
It follows from textual evidence that;
- As much as I tried to squash my cultural identity, my peers were curious, often asking questions revolved around the practical — “Why are you vegetarian?” or “What’s a sari?” — to the more personal — “You go to a temple?
On this note, it follows from the text that people initially had cultural differences even though they want to squash their cultural differences.
Read more on textual evidence;
brainly.com/question/25658352
#SPJ1
Answer:
A - the cocktail party effect.
Explanation:
The cocktail party effect is a phenomenon of the brain involving an ability to focus one's auditory attention on a particular stimulus while filtering out the rest. In this case, the woman recognises, through the events noise, the spoken name of her latest partner.