Unless Mark Sloan grows a few inches, he will always need my help to reach the cookie jar.
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer: you just do each step in each part
Explanation: give em a brainliest plz plz plz
Can you shorten the question a little bit shorter please if you can.
Roger Chillingworth does not wish to explain why he has abandoned his wife to live with Indians where he has studied herbs and medicinal cures. His past history would be subject to questioning and, according to the Puritans, would be considered witchcraft.