Answer:
The battle of Iwo Okinawa was a battle of the Japanese Imperial army military force against the U.S's military force.
On the U.S's side, they did it to attempt acess to mainland Japan, and on Japan's side they did it because it was mid WW2 and they couldn't let the allies stop their conquest to obtain China, the Korean peninsula, and the Philippine islands.
The battle went like this;
- The U.S invaded the island (in February 19, 1945) to try to get access to airfields of the island that was very near the coast (750 miles) of Japan to help plan an easier future mainland invasion into Japanese soil.
- The battle lasted for 5 weeks, making it an excruciatingly bloody battle, having around 7,200 people killed.
- The Japanese started running low on supplies so they had to surrender, U.S was victorious, the island fell into U.S forces.
- The U.S also then later captured Mount Suribachi in the island and planted a flag at the summit.
Casualties: around 7,200
NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN BATTLE: 70,000 U.S soldiers and 18,000 Japanese soldiers
The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
A political and constitutional issue that Americans have different beliefs and opinions on is the issue of Gun control.
Those who support gun control believe that it would help reduce the high rate of gun violence that is witnessed in the United States every year from mass shootings to robberies and murders.
Those who are against gun control believe that Americans should have the right to bear arms to be able to defend themselves from aggression. They believe that the more people with guns, the less likely others are able to engage in mass shootings as they would be shot.
<h3 /><h3>What does t
he Constitution say on gun rights?</h3>
The United States Constitution in the Second Amendment allows Americans to be able to bear arms and this has created a debate between those who support gun control and those who don't.
The supporters of gun control believe that it would help reduce the high rate of gun violence that is witnessed in the United States every year from mass shootings to robberies and murders.
The dissenters and those who argue against gun control believe that Americans should have the right to bear arms to be able to defend themselves from aggression. They believe that the more people with guns, the less likely others are able to engage in mass shootings as they would be shot.
Find out more on gun control in the United States at brainly.com/question/4379013
#SPJ1
Answer:
Because if there wasn't tension, uncomfort, and conflict in society, nothing would be done. Who would want to resolve race issues if there was no tension about it? It's important to gain notice of crucial issues that need to be fixed and to stir debate.
