Answer:
Explanation:2. What can be done today is to confront it and educate it to people to they are aware of our history and can know to to do better and think about what COULD have been done better. The government can make amends by awknowledging it and not being afraid to adress it....3. I think they would choose another policy different from the one used in ww2 because frankly its inhumane and people today tend to be alot more proggressive and innovative so they would most likley come up with a different solution.
1- The correct answer is A. Samuel Houston was the Texan leader who most supported the annexation to the United States. In fact, he was President of the Republic of Texas twice, and from his position he always fought for annexation, unlike others like Mirabeau Lamar. In addition, it is stated that Houston went to Texas sent by President Andrew Jackson to achieve annexation.
2- Houston argued that the annexation had to be carried out to respect the will and right of the Texan people (which were made up of American settlers) to decide the legal status of their territory. This argument is related to the right of self-determination of peoples, which I consider valid since it's theb population who has the power to decide on their future and that of the territory they inhabit and administer, not being the states able to make decisions contrary to the people and their will.
Answer:
C- Separation of powers
Explanation:
Seperation of power is the system whereby responsibilities and power are divided and assigned to various arm of the gvernment inorder to ensure effecient and effective delivery of the dividends of democracy to the citizens.
This principle recognizes the fact that, despite the laws and rules of the federal government oft United States, the individual states in US also has its own power to enact laws that would enable it to deliver. This laws may be contrary to the federal laws.
