The purpose of the Yalta Conference (February 1945) was to discuss what Europe would look like after World War II. The conference involved the three largest allied powers during this time, including the US, Soviet Union, and Great Britain. This meeting revolved around getting Germany to surrender unconditionally as well as a plan for reorganizing territories and who would control them after the war.
The Potsdam Conference (July-August 1945) focused on punishing war criminals, land boundaries, reparations payments, and getting Japan to unconditionally surrender. Japans surrender would essentially end World War II.
Douglass portrays the slave traders and agents for slave traders as men auctioning for cattle instead of human beings. The slave traders and agents for slave traders at no point stop to think what they are doing is wrong, instead, it is business as usual and they are eager to acquire misbehaved slaves at steep discounts, much the same as farmers will bid pennies on the dollar for underweight farm animals.
I believe the answer is A.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
These colonies were also different. There was <u>more religious freedom in the Middle colonies</u> than in the New England colonies. This was especially true in Pennsylvania. The <u>Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves</u>. This is true because there was <u>more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming</u>. Thus, another difference is the <u>kind of farming</u> done. In the <u>New England colonies</u>, <u>subsistence farming was practiced</u>. These<u> farmers grew enough for their family, but didn’t have too much left to sell to other people</u>. In the <u>Middle colonies, farmers grew crops for sale</u>. The main cash crop was wheat.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "The program called for increased government spending." one reason some people supported supply-side economics and others opposed it is that <span>The program called for increased government spending.</span>
