There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
He calls the raven a prophet, a thing of evil, and a fiend
you didnt include any picture or doc so i cant answer
C.
This is because the question says "than" followed by a name (noun). You can say more friendly but it is not commonly used in the US.
The correct lines (there are three) are No time hath she to sport and play, She weaveth steadily, Therefore no other care hath she, and She lives with little joy or fear. If you are on Plato, this is the answer. Just got 5 out of 5 and this was one of the questions. Good luck!
