Answer:
We put a comma after the subordinate clause.
Explanation:
When a subordinating adverb phrase or clause comes before the main clause of a sentence, the subordinate clause should be followed by a comma to separate the subordinate clause information with the independent's clause information. Here are some examples:
<u><em>After the walk,</em></u><em> we went to the shopping mall </em>(Adverb phrase underlined).
<u><em>In total silence,</em></u><em> she waited </em>(Adverb phrase underlined).
<u><em>Before you leave,</em></u><em> could you please shut the door? </em>(Adverb clause underlined)
<u><em>Since you do not care about the class</em></u><em>, you may leave the room </em>(Adverb clause underlined)
<em>Notice that the difference between adverb phrases and clauses is that clauses always have a subject and a verb while phrases do not.</em>
Answer: you dont know how to do that be your self
Explanation:what grade are you in just asking?
Answer:
It limits the readers knowledge of other characters.
Explanation:
As opposed to third person omniscient, which consists of an "all-knowing" narrator, third-person-limited point of view only allows the reader to know what the main character is doing. The main character's thoughts may be mentioned, but the reader is not privy to the other character's thoughts, or even their actions when they are not with the main character.
I do not believe a longer school calendar is a good idea for a few reasons. One reason is that I believe kids need to have time to be kids and have some time off of school. Also, students wouldn’t tire out as easily with the ongoing overload of school. A con can be that childcare could be difficult to find when they are not in school and also that some kids do better with consistency and no break.
Each year, millions of people fail to vote without reproach. Does abstention constitute a citizen's right not to vote? This article in Australian Journal of Political Science explores whether we have a legal right to a 'no vote' and if such a right should be protected as fiercely as the right to vote. Lisa Hill discusses the 'no vote', its implications for society and reaches a firm conclusion.
