Well they both helped to modernize/industrialize the U.S, so it depends which view point you would like to take. They stole the plans from england, who had successfully monopolized industrialization for almost a century, who would be upset at this loss of control and therefore business. However an American would probably be thankful for the industry that blossomed as a result of these actions.
According to John B. Gordon, a Southern point of view regarding the power of states under the <span>Constitution was that state sovereignty was more important than federal power. </span>
The un-employment rate in the us during 1934 was 21.7% and The further weather drought problems in the US Midwest continued and some 35 million acres of farmland were utterly destroyed and a further 225 million acres were in danger.
Answer:
Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment. The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence...
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!
An important difference between Edison‘s inventions and those dire industrial technologies after the civil war was Edison's early inventions did not favour mass production of goods.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The emergence of urgency for new industrial technologies resulted in the invention of many crucial machines and devices. These technologically advanced machines proved beneficial in undertaking mass production of commodities.
The early inventions of Thomas Alva Edison were not relevant to the contemporary need of the industry as the inventions were that of the phonograph and the incandescent bulb.
