A 49-year-old male presents with an acute onset of crushing chest pain and diaphoresis. you should evaluate how well he is breathing.
<h3>What is diaphoresis?</h3>
- Diaphoresis is the medical term for persistent, excessive perspiration.
- This kind of sweating is frequently brought on by an underlying medical issue or a normal life event, like menopause. The body naturally regulates its temperature through sweat.
- Menopause, pregnancy, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, infections, and some malignancies are among the common causes of diaphoresis.
- In order to reduce perspiration, the underlying issue or medicine must be found and treated.
- Eccrine and apocrine sweat glands are found in your skin.
- Typically, diaphoresis is a sign of an underlying medical issue. Some illnesses have the potential to be fatal and demand urgent medical care.
Learn more about diaphoresis here:
brainly.com/question/14890091
#SPJ4
Canassatego appears in British historical documents only during the last eight years of his life, and so little is known of his early life.His earliest documented appearance is at a treaty conference in Philadelphia in 1742,[2] where he was a spokesman for the Onondaga people, one of the six nations of the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee) League. According to most modern scholars, Canassatego did not appear to be one of the fourteen Onondaga hereditary sachems who sat on the Iroquois Grand Council. But Johansen disagrees, saying that Canassatego held the League title of Tadadaho.
This map shows Pennsylvania's land purchases from Native Americans. Canassatego had a role in the 1736 and 1749 sales, although the Iroquois League nations had a questionable claim to those lands.
In the 1730s, a faction of Iroquois leaders opened a diplomatic relationship with the British Province of Pennsylvania, facilitated by Conrad Weiser, Pennsylvania's interpreter and agent. Pennsylvania agreed to recognize the Iroquois as the owner of all Indian lands in Pennsylvania; the Iroquois, in turn, agreed to sell lands only to Pennsylvania representatives.Canassatego probably attended a 1736 treaty where some Iroquois chiefs sold land along the Susquehanna River to Pennsylvania, although the territory had traditionally been occupied by the Lenape people.
Canassatego served as the speaker for the Onondaga at another conference in 1742, where the Iroquois chiefs collected the final payment for the 1736 land sale. At this meeting, Canassatego managed to convince Governor Thomas Penn to pay more than the original purchase price. Penn, for his part, urged Canassatego to remove the Delaware Indians from what was known as the Walking Purchase of 1737, which was quite controversial. Canassatego complied, berating the Delawares as "women" who had no right to sell land, and ordering them to leave. "You are women; take the Advice of a Wise Man and remove immediately", he told the Delaware. The Iroquois denigration of the Delaware as "women" has been the subject of much scholarly writing.
Answer:
c. Private ownership can give the incentive to the owner, to fulfill the wishes of others, and get the investment back, like a restaurant or school
Explanation:
Fulfilling the wishes of others tend to make it easier for the owners to resale the property (since that property will look a lot closer to the buyers' liking) . Fast re-sale of the property will also make it faster for the owner to get the investment back.
Sometimes, reselling the property is not the only method to recoup the investment. Transforming the property into other revenue generating establishment such as restaurant, car-wash, school, boutique, etc could also be an effective method to recoup the investment.
Answer:
Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for direct patent infringement
Explanation:
In the court of law it is difficult to prove that Samantha did not know that the earlier patent existed. As, far as the court knows she made a comb which was identical to the one of the patent.
She would not be able to sell the rest of her inventory she would be held guilty of infringing the patent whether she had known or not known.
So, Harry's statement was wrong.
