I think that it is <span>Benjamin Franklin, but I am not sure.
</span>
Thomas Hobbes thought that all humans were naturally selfish and greedy, and needed the power of an absolute ruler to hold them back. He thought that the people should obey the rulers every word. Locke said that a true government was meant to protect all natural rights of a person, and that the people had to have a voice in government. He was against the monarchy, because he believed that it was not protecting the natural rights of the people, and reversely, going against them.
They experience more daylight hours because the sun is over
head at the equator and the rays of the sun are evenly spread across the earth therefore resulting in more day than night. So the answer is B.
Before the battle, Macedonian scouts had reported an overwhelming numerical superiority of the Persian forces and the works ordered by king Darius to flatten out the site he chose for the battlefield so that his chariots had no trouble traversing it. Parmenion, Alexander's most veteran general, advised to launch an attack at night in order to make up for the numerical disadvantage, Alexander rejected the plan since he fell it would away the full glory out of his victory. Instead, he came up with an unusual strategy: he had his lines of <em>sarissa </em>lancers form obliquely with respect to the Persian lines, so the right flank would be closer to the enemy and the left one further away. In addition, he instructed his troops to allow the chariots to pass through their lines by stepping aside of their way and had light infantry troops armed with slingshots take out the chariot drivers and lancers.
As Alexander had expected, Darius ordered his chariots to attack and were put out of combat quickly. As the two armies came closer to each other, Alexander and his cavalry corps of Companions dashed at full gallop from the right flank with one sole objective: find Darius to capture him or kill him so that the Persian army was thrown into disarray once their commander was gone. As Alexander himself came a few yards close to Darius, Darius panicked and fled from the battlefield right away, which demoralized and threw the Persians into disarray. Alexander was about to go after Darius when he learned that general Parmenion's units were in badly need of support, so Alexander decided to come and rescue his troops. However, the word of Darius's fleeing the battlefield quickly spread throughout the Persian army which lost coherence and was routed afterwards.
Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
