The figurative language used is simile, which means two different things are being compared and, while the tone is matter-of-factly, the mood is of disgust.

<h3>The figurative language in the text</h3>

The text we are analyzing here contains a simile. Let's answer each question about it below:

Type of figurative language: simile.

Meaning of figurative language: It compares two different things with the use of "like." Here, injustice is compared to a pus-filled boil.

Effect on tone and mood: The author's tone is matter-of-factly, as he makes the comparison as if there was no way to argue with him. The mood is of disgust, since reader cannot help by imagine the boil and the pus as the simile is used.

Effect on audience: The audience ends up associating the disgusting image of the boil with injustice, which may persuade people to do something to change it.

With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.

Learn more about simile here:

brainly.com/question/14234454

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago

To minimise deterioration, cutting wheels must be stored in a room which is dry and not subject to extreme temperatures.

Lunna [17]

$\huge\fbox\red{❥answer}$

To prevent warping, thin, organic bonded wheels such as those used for cutting-off should be laid flat on a horizontal surface of steel or similar rigid material away from excessive heat and moisture.22 To minimise deterioration, wheels must be stored in a room which is dry and not subject to extreme temperatures.

3 0

2 years ago

Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice. Your

bixtya [17]

Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice.

In his 1946 work "Existentialism is Humanism", Sartre explores existentialism and its effect on humanity. He states that a coward is: "defined by the deed that he has done. What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward." The action of the coward defines him, an aspect that can be changed only by him. If he is committed to change what defines him, he can erase the notion of being a coward.

Nevertheless, Sartre mentions that “There is no reality except in action”, and this reveals the importance of reality. Humans, regardless of the outcome of an unattainable future, are still in control of some aspects of their reality through their actions; thus, they can shape their individual futures in a way.

This is "total freedom" defined solely by the individual, as Sartre says: "Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards." What matters in someone's existence is what is decided. A decision is going to shape someone's reality and will define whether the person is a hero or a coward.

7 0

3 years ago

At the end of the first paragraph, the author's commentary regarding "[e]ach one of these treaties" (sentence 6) primarily serve

Artemon [7]

Answer:

The treaties

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago